1946 Buick 40 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Buick 40 (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 711 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | 40 | EJ |
Year Released | 1946 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1134 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2680 mm |