1946 Buick 40 vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1964 Lotus Elan is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Buick 40 (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Buick | Lotus |
| Model | 40 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2140 mm |
