1946 Buick 40 vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 Triumph 2000 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Buick 40 (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Buick | Triumph |
| Model | 40 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1170 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2700 mm |
