1946 Buick 40 vs. 1969 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1969 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 229 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 1969 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1946 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1416 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2750 mm |