1946 Buick 40 vs. 1982 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1982 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 162 kg more than 1982 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 1982 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1946 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1483 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2560 mm |