1946 Buick 40 vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 162 kg more than 1995 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1946 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1483 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2580 mm |