1946 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2000 Toyota Corona is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Corona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2000 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Corona |
Year Released | 1946 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |