1946 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (136 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 136 kg more than 2000 Volvo S60.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | 40 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1509 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2800 mm |
