1946 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (187 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 233 kg more than 2001 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2001 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1946 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1412 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2880 mm |