1946 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 415 kg more than 1946 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1946 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 4807 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 2260 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2950 mm |