1946 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2003 Ford Taurus is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 168 kg more than 2003 Ford Taurus.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2003 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | 40 | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1477 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3030 mm |
