1946 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (174 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 75 kg more than 1946 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 40 | E |
Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2860 mm |