1946 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Buick 40 (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (139 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2003 Volvo V50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | 40 | V50 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1465 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2720 mm |