1946 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 53 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1592 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2890 mm |
