1946 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 398 kg more than 1946 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Buick | Toyota |
| Model | 40 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 2043 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2610 mm |
