1946 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Buick 40 (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S60. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 276 kg more than 2006 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | 40 | S60 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 93.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1569 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2720 mm |