1946 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2009 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2009 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | STS |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 3599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1635 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2960 mm |
