1946 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
| Model | 40 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1845 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2710 mm |
