1946 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2009 Fiat Croma is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Croma (197 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Croma weights approximately 80 kg more than 1946 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2009 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | Buick | Fiat |
| Model | 40 | Croma |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2387 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1725 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2710 mm |
