1946 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda HR-V is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Buick 40 (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2009 Honda HR-V. (104 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda HR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 588 kg more than 2009 Honda HR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2009 Honda HR-V | |
Make | Buick | Honda |
Model | 40 | HR-V |
Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1257 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2460 mm |