1946 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (301 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 641 kg more than 1946 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Buick | Land Rover |
| Model | 40 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 2486 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3230 mm |
