1946 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2760 mm |