1946 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 448 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 270 kg more than 1946 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1915 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2880 mm |