1946 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 328 kg more than 1946 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2010 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Traverse |
Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 2173 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3020 mm |