1946 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 520 kg more than 2010 Mazda Tribute.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | 40 | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1125 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2630 mm |
