1946 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 310 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 40 | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1535 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2670 mm |
