1946 Buick 40 vs. 2011 Kia Forte
To start off, 2011 Kia Forte is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 604 kg more than 2011 Kia Forte.
Because 1946 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Buick 40 | 2011 Kia Forte | |
Make | Buick | Kia |
Model | 40 | Forte |
Year Released | 1946 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1241 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2649 mm |