1946 Buick 40 vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 259 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Buick | Lotus |
| Model | 40 | Evora |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1386 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2575 mm |
