1946 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Lada Vaz
To start off, 2000 Lada Vaz is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 821 kg more than 2000 Lada Vaz.
Because 2000 Lada Vaz is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Vaz will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Lada Vaz | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | 62 | Vaz |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1045 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2500 mm |
