1946 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 474 kg more than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Because 1946 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Ford C-MAX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | C-MAX |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 144 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1392 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2650 mm |
