1946 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 459 kg more than 1946 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 2325 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3510 mm |