1946 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 274 kg more than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | 62 | Outback |
Year Released | 1946 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1592 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2530 mm |