1946 Citroen 11 vs. 1972 Volvo 164
To start off, 1972 Volvo 164 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Volvo 164 (156 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1946 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1946 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 164 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1946 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1946 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Citroen 11 | 1972 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 11 | 164 |
Year Released | 1946 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2730 mm |