1946 Citroen 7A vs. 1966 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 1966 Volvo P 1800 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Citroen 7A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Citroen 7A would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Volvo P 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Volvo P 1800 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1946 Citroen 7A. (33 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Volvo P 1800 should accelerate faster than 1946 Citroen 7A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Volvo P 1800 weights approximately 192 kg more than 1946 Citroen 7A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1946 Citroen 7A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Citroen 7A | 1966 Volvo P 1800 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 7A | P 1800 |
Year Released | 1946 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1303 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2460 mm |