1946 Citroen 7A vs. 2001 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2001 Smart ForTwo is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Citroen 7A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Citroen 7A would be higher. At 1,529 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Citroen 7A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForTwo (40 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1946 Citroen 7A. (35 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1946 Citroen 7A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Citroen 7A weights approximately 91 kg more than 2001 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2001 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1946 Citroen 7A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Citroen 7A | 2001 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Citroen | Smart |
| Model | 7A | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1529 cc | 798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 1820 mm |
