1946 Ford Taunus vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1946 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1946 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 304 kg more than 1946 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Ford Taunus | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Taunus | EJ |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 64 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2680 mm |
