1946 Ford Taunus vs. 2000 Mazda Demio
To start off, 2000 Mazda Demio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda Demio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda Demio (62 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1946 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Demio should accelerate faster than 1946 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda Demio weights approximately 130 kg more than 1946 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Demio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Ford Taunus | 2000 Mazda Demio | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taunus | Demio |
Year Released | 1946 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2400 mm |