1946 Ford Taunus vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (148 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1946 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1946 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1946 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1946 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1946 Ford Taunus has manual transmission. 1946 Ford Taunus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: