1946 GAZ M-20 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1946 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1946 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1946 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1946 GAZ M-20 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | GAZ | Mazda |
Model | M-20 | 3 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |