1946 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 505 kg more than 1946 Jaguar Mark IV.
Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Jaguar Mark IV | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | Mark IV | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1776 cc | 2982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
