1946 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1946 Jaguar Mark IV.
Because 1946 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1946 Jaguar Mark IV has manual transmission. 1946 Jaguar Mark IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Jaguar Mark IV | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | Mark IV | S60 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1776 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2670 mm |
