1946 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Jaguar Mark IV is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 54 kg more than 1946 Jaguar Mark IV.
Because 1946 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Jaguar Mark IV | 2009 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Jaguar | Kia |
| Model | Mark IV | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1776 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1399 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2660 mm |
