1946 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 139 kg more than 1946 Jaguar Mark IV.
Because 1946 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Jaguar Mark IV | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | Mark IV | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1776 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1484 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4442 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1806 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2619 mm |
