1946 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 42 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3.
Because 1946 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Jaguar Mark IV | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | Mark IV | 3 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1776 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1303 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2640 mm |