1946 Jaguar MK IV vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jaguar MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jaguar MK IV would be higher. At 2,663 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Jaguar MK IV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1946 Jaguar MK IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Jaguar MK IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1946 Jaguar MK IV has manual transmission. 1946 Jaguar MK IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Jaguar MK IV | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Jaguar | Audi |
Model | MK IV | TT |
Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1842 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2469 mm |