1946 Jeep CJ2A vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 1978 Mazda 626 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 626 (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 115 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626.
Because 1946 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1946 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Jeep CJ2A | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ2A | 626 |
Year Released | 1946 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2520 mm |