1946 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2005 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2005 Lotus Elise is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotus Elise (190 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 214 kg more than 2005 Lotus Elise.
Because 1946 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Lotus Elise. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1946 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lotus Elise (187 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Lotus Elise will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Jeep CJ2A | 2005 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | CJ2A | Elise |
Year Released | 1946 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 187 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 896 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2310 mm |