1946 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1946 Jeep CJ2A.
Because 1946 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1946 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Jeep CJ2A | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | CJ2A | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2685 mm |
