1946 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1946 Jeep CJ2A.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. 2012 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1946 Jeep CJ2A has manual transmission. 1946 Jeep CJ2A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Jeep CJ2A | 2012 Audi TT | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | CJ2A | TT |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2469 mm |
