1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900
To start off, 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900 (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900 should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900 weights approximately 426 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900 | |
Make | Lancia | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Ardea 3 | 1900 |
Year Released | 1946 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 1884 cc |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2710 mm |